TCPHEE   

Tobacco Control and Public Health in Eastern Europe
founded in honor of professor Ilya N. Andreev,
the first coordinator of the coalition 
‘For smoke-free Tatarstan'

 

ISSN 2222-2693 (Print)
ISSN 2222-4629
(Online)

English Russian Ukrainian

- About
- Editorial Board
- Instructions for authors
- Online submission
- Calls for papers
- Contact information
- Issues

- Collections
- Indexed in
- Subscribe to content alerts
- RSS feed

Русский

- О журнале
- Редакционная коллегия
- Инструкции для авторов
- Приглашения к подаче статей
- Контактная информация
- Выпуски

- Русскоязычные коллекции
- Подписаться на извещения

Українська

- Про журнал
- Редакційна колегія
- Інструкції для авторів
- Запрошення до подачі статей
- Контактна інформація
- Випуски
- Підписатися на оголошення

VK VK

 

 

Google Groups
Subscribe to
TCPHEE content alerts
Email:
Visit this group

Conference abstract

The determinants of quitting or reducing smoking due to the tobacco tax increase
Olena Tigova

BACKGROUND. Ukraine has adopted State targeted social program for reducing the harmful effects of tobacco on public health in Ukraine till 2012. One of the measures to be implemented is increasing excise tax on tobacco products; therefore, a highly important question is which groups of population are likely to benefit from tax increase through quitting or reducing smoking.
METHODS. Data used for analysis were collected in a nationally representative survey of Ukrainian population conducted in 2010. An outcome measure was the anticipated keeping smoking versus quitting (reducing) smoking due to tobacco tax increase. Independent variables included socio-demographic characteristics, experience of quitting smoking, exposure to different tobacco control measures, exposure to tobacco advertizing. Binary logistic regression was used to measure associations.
RESULTS. Respondents were more likely to expect to keep smoking after the tobacco tax increase if they were dependent on tobacco (odds ratio 2.57), not interested in quitting, not in favor of tobacco tax increase, and exposed to tobacco advertising on TV and cigarette promotions. Respondents were more likely to expect to reduce or quit smoking if they had higher wealth status (OR=0.55), were aware of tobacco health hazard (OR=0.09), had earlier attempts of quitting smoking, were not exposed to secondhand smoke, observed tobacco-related information on television (OR=0.7) and in newspapers (OR=0.45), and observed advertizing of tobacco on radio (OR=0.33) and in public transport (OR=0.25).
CONCLUSIONS. Several aspects are important while implementing taxation policy. It is more likely to result in quitting or reducing smoking among those who are less dependent, have tried quitting smoking earlier, and have higher wealth level. Concurrent smoke-free policies and awareness campaigns may potentiate the effect of taxation policies and are recommended to be developed further.

Abstract (pdf) in English

 

 

http://andreevin.narod.ru/journal       http://journals.uran.ua/tcphee       email

Хостинг от uCoz