Tobacco Control and Public Health in Eastern Europe
founded in honor of professor Ilya N. Andreev,
the first coordinator of the coalition 
‘For smoke-free Tatarstan'


ISSN 2222-2693 (Print)
ISSN 2222-4629

English Russian Ukrainian

- About
- Editorial Board
- Instructions for authors
- Online submission
- Calls for papers
- Contact information
- Issues

- Collections
- Indexed in
- Subscribe to content alerts
- RSS feed


- О журнале
- Редакционная коллегия
- Инструкции для авторов
- Приглашения к подаче статей
- Контактная информация
- Выпуски

- Русскоязычные коллекции
- Подписаться на извещения


- Про журнал
- Редакційна колегія
- Інструкції для авторів
- Запрошення до подачі статей
- Контактна інформація
- Випуски
- Підписатися на оголошення




Google Groups
Subscribe to
TCPHEE content alerts
Visit this group

Conference abstract

Factors which predetermine tobacco smoke air pollution in cafes, restaurants, and bars of Donetsk city, Ukraine
Tetyana Durneva, Nadiya Pashkova, Nastya Prokopenko, Svetlana Burlakova, Yuliya Kubanova, Rostislav Dzyuba, Tatiana Andreeva

BACKGROUND: Smoke-free policy is an effective tobacco control measure. Current legislation of Ukraine requires at least half of the premises of cafes, restaurants, and bars to be smoke-free provided that tobacco smoke does not penetrate from the smoking areas.
METHODS: Data on fine particulate matter air pollution was collected in 28 facilities from December 2011 through January 2012 according to the international protocol with the use of Sidepak Aerosol Monitor. Characteristics of the facilities were recorded along with the data on whether smoking was observed. Height, length and width of premises were measured as well. To analyze factors that affect air pollution, generalized linear model utility in SPSS 15.0 was used. Results are presented as 95% confidence intervals of particulate matter concentrations.
RESULTS: Among 25 facilities with designated smoking areas, only nine had areas for non-smokers larger than the designated smoking areas. Particulate matter air concentrations in those three facilities where all the premises were smoke-free constituted 82-94 µ/m3. Concentrations in rooms for non-smokers and smokers in facilities with thoroughly divided premises were 144-158 µ/m3  and 411-625 µ/m3 respectively and in those without the division 384-436 µ/m3 in premises for non-smokers and 471-537 µ/m3  where smoking was allowed. With other factors controlled (facility size, type – bar present or not, ventilation, smoking occurring or not), there was no significant difference in concentrations between those premises where smoking was allowed and where it wasn’t if the facility was not totally smoke-free.
CONCLUSION: Current legislation of Ukraine, which requires designated smoking areas, does not protect visitors against tobacco smoke, as it does penetrate to the non-smoking areas in most of the examined facilities of Donetsk. Introduction of 100% smoke-free policies will protect public health and simplify control and enforcement.
KEYWORDS: tobacco smoke, particulate matter, smoke-free policies, smoking, public places, café, restaurants, bars, Ukraine, Donetsk.

Abstract (pdf) in English and Russian       email

Хостинг от uCoz